I doubt these three options exhaust our lives; a more common comparison is between Money and Health, or Money and Happiness.
On the way walking from UAACC - United African Alliance Community Center - out to the main road, I asked my company - Steve, Susie, and a rasta guy Mwalimu(or something like that) - how they would rank the three.
Mwalimu: Money > Time > Friends.
Susie: Friends > Time > Money.
Steve: Money > Friends > Time.
What is Time by the way? Time for yourself? Is time equivalent to longevity?
When I asked the question I hadn’t put much though into it. Now, as I think about it more, I think Time is time for yourself. Time to do what you want.
Susie would give up her money first, and if necessary her personal time, for her friends.
Of course, the context is important. There are times that we would give up one for the other and other times we wouldn’t. So for simplicity’s sake, let’s assume that for the rest of your life, you’ll have to live without one of the three, and one of the three you’ll have for certain, the other will only show up randomly 50% of the time.
Me: Time > Friends > Money.
I think I can live in the woods, without any money, on my own working on my goals, and have friends visit me once in a while. It’s really a hard call, actually, friends make my life. But I would be more disappointed, I think, if at the end of my life I have only achieved half of my goals, or half of every goal.
How would you rank the three? and, if you want, why?





